Insurance policies are normally going to have a declarations page.  This page will identify the insured, the policy limits, and times of coverage.  The declarations page is to show the insured what the insurance policy covers.

In determining the coverage provided by an insurance policy, always review the declarations page.  The declarations page will list the various forms and endorsements that make up the policy.  There are situations where the insurance company attaches the wrong forms to the policy.  That is why it is important to compare what is on the declarations page to what is actually attached to the policy.

The declarations page should include the following information:

The Claims Journal published an article January 18, 2018.  It is titled, Insured Must Obtain Settlement Consent Where Policies Require It.  The article discusses a case from the 9th Circuit Court and looks at California law.  However, Texas law has the same laws as it relates to coverage.

The article tells us that where insurance policies require written consent from the insurer to enter into any settlement agreement, it is important to ask, for permission from the insurer before entering into a settlement agreement.  Failure to do so may void coverage.

That is what occurred recently in One West Bank, FSB v. Houston Casualty Co.  In the case, Houston Casualty issued a professional liability policy which had a restrictive condition requiring the insured to seek prior written consent prior to entering into any type of settlement agreement regarding a covered claim.

Life insurance lawyers know there are provisions that are illegal for an insurance company to put into a life insurance policy.  These provisions are found in the Texas Insurance Code, Sections 1101.051 to 1101.055.

Pursuant to these sections of the Texas Insurance Code, no life insurance policy may be issued or delivered to a person in Texas, or be issued by a life insurance company incorporated under the laws of Texas, if it contains any of the following provisions:

  1.  a provision limiting the time within which any action at law or in equity may be commenced to less than two years after the cause of action accrues;

Fort Worth life insurance lawyers see lots of situations where a person had a credit life policy.  It is most often associated with the purchase of an automobile.

There are specific laws in the Texas Insurance Code dealing with these types of policies.  Section 1153.052, says that each individual policy or group certificate of credit life insurance and credit accident and health insurance must set forth in the policy the following:

  1. the insurer’s name and home office address

Dallas life insurance lawyers know provisions that must be included in life insurance policies.

The Texas Insurance Code, Section 1101.003(a), states that an insurance policies must contain several prescribed provisions.  Pursuant to Section 1101.002(b), a single premium life insurance policy is not required to contain a provision under this sub-chapter to the extent that the provision is not applicable to a single premium insurance policy.  Otherwise, these required provisions generally include but are not limited to:

  1.  Pursuant to Section 1101.003, a life insurance policy must provide that the policy and the application for the policy constitute the entire contract between the parties.

Pursuant to the Texas Insurance Code, Section 1251.101, group accident, health, and accident and health insurance policies must contain several prescribed provisions that include the following:

  1.  premiums due must be remitted on or before the due date by the premium payors as designated in the policy and within any specified grace period;
  2.  the validity of the policy may not be contested except for nonpayment of premiums after it has been in force for two years from the date issued and that, in the absence of fraud, no statement made by any person covered by the policy relating to his or her insurability may be used in contesting the validity of the insurance with respect to which such statement was made after the insurance has been in force before the contest for two years during that person’s lifetime, nor unless it is contained in an instrument signed by him or her;

According to the Fort Worth Court of Appeals opinion from 1995, styled, Truck Insurance Exchange v. Musick, insurance policies are normally issued on standard forms containing terms drafted by the insurance company.

Keep in mind that Texas has standard automobile policy forms approved by the Texas Department of Insurance.  For homeowners insurance there are three standard policies — the HO-A, HO-B, and HO-C.  In addition insurers may offer alternative policies, if approved by the Texas Department of Insurance.

As stated by the 1999, Texarkana Court of Appeals opinion, Tri-State Pipe & Equipment, Inc. v. Southern County Mutual Insurance Co., because the insurance company prepares the standard forms of its insurance policies, it controls what clauses are contained in the policies, and the insured has little or no bargaining power over the nature and extent of those clauses.  Therefore, the law places on the insurance company the burden to include in its policies the various provisions relating to the kind and extent of coverage that the law requires.

Without an insurable interest, an insurance contract is a gambling contract, and gambling contracts cannot legally be enforced.  For example, David cannot insure Paul’s house in which David has no insurable interest, betting (gambling) the house will suffer a loss.  If David could win this bet, he would receive a return far in excess of the premium he otherwise would pay, but would face no risk other than the cost of the premium.

Insurance provides well recognized opportunities for profit to an insured who deliberately causes an insured event to occur.  For example, after purchasing property insurance on Paul’s house, David might deliberately start a fire to collect the insurance.  The insurable interest requirement therefore reduces intentional losses created by one party having a disproportionate financial interest in causing a loss.  The temptation to cause loss will be reduced when an insurable interest exists.  For example, although Paul might destroy the property of an unrelated person like David for his own financial gain, he will be less willing to set fire to his own house, because of the inevitable loss of his own possessions.

The principle of indemnity means a person should not profit from an insured loss.  Most property and casualty insurance contracts are contracts of indemnity.  In contrast to a valued contract, which provides for the payment of some pre-established dollar amount, a contract of indemnity provides for payment of the sum directly related to the amount lost, subject to the limitations of the policy.  The insurer therefore indemnifies the insured for pecuniary loss to that property or activity in which the insured has a personal interest.  This is discussed in the 1963, Texas Supreme Court opinion styled, Smith v. Eagle Star Insurance Co.

Does my potential new client have an insurable interest?  That is a question insurance lawyers have to answer first when talking to someone who believes they are owed money on an insurance claim.

As stated by the Dallas Court of Appeals in 1993, in the opinion styled, Jones v. Texas Pacific Indemnity Co., “A party must have an insurable interest in the insured property to recover under an insurance policy.”  It is  not necessary that the party own the property to have an insurable interest.  An insurable interest is an exposure to financial loss possessed by a person giving rise to a legal interest that the insured possesses a right to protect.  An insured who owns a house or auto therefore has an insurable interest in the house or auto because the insured would be hurt financially if the house or auto were damaged or destroyed.  This is also discussed by the Texas Supreme Court in the 1963, opinion styled, Smith v. Eagle Star Insurance Co.  An insurable interest does not constitute an entitlement to insurance because the insurer is permitted to underwrite and price the risk sought to be insured.  Even if an insurance policy is issued, it cannot be enforced by a party who has no insurable interest — even if that party is a named insured.  This was discussed in the 1972, Amarillo Court of Appeals opinion styled, North River Insurance Co. v. Fisher.

An insurable interest is necessary for the following reasons:

Weatherford insurance lawyers need to recognize “first party” policies when they see them.  Here are some examples:

  1.  The standard Texas Auto Policy covers accidental loss or damage to the covered auto.  If an insured is involved in a single car accident resulting in property damage to the insured vehicle, the insured possessing this type of coverage may submit a claim directly to their insurer and receive compensation for the damage to their vehicle in accordance with the terms of the Texas Auto Policy.
  2.  Health insurance refers to coverage for medical and hospital expenses and may be issued on an individual or group basis.  An insured who requires health care due to an illness or injury may submit a claim directly to their own insurer for the reasonable and necessary costs of the health care received.  If the insured has paid for their health care, the insurer will reimburse the insured.  It is also common practice for the health care provider to take an assignment of the insured’s interest in insurance benefits enabling the insurer to pay the care provider directly.
Contact Information