Articles Posted in Claims Denial

Insurance claims usually don’t need an expert to testify but an attorney handling these types of claims needs to know when to hire an expert.  This is illustrated in a 2024 opinion from the Fort Worth Court of Appeals.  The opinion is styled State Farm Lloyds v. John Hilmi.

Hilmi had his home and contents insured by State Farm.  Helms asserts a lightening strike caused almost $200,000 of personal property at his home to be ‘fried”.   State Farm disagreed and this lawsuit was filed against State Farm for breach of contract and violations of the Texas Insurance Code.

A jury trial was conducted and resulted in a favorable verdict for Hilmi.  State Farm appealed and this Court reversed the judgment.  The opinion should be read to get an understanding of the facts and testimony at trial.  What follows is the legal logic.

A claim being denied doesn’t necessarily mean an expert has to be hired in the case.  But when an expert is needed the correct legal process must be followed.  This is illustrated in a 2024 opinion from the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division.  The opinion is styled, Dora Doss Thompson v. State Farm Lloyds.

This case arises out of an insurer’s denial of a property damage claim.  Defendant State Farm Lloyds (“State Farm”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment.  For the reasons that follow, State Farm’s motion was granted.

Plaintiff Dora Doss Thompson obtained an insurance policy (“Policy”) from State Farm, covering wind and hail damage occurring between April 12, 2021 and April 12, 2022 at her home located at 21014 Pricewood Manor Court, Cypress, Texas 77433 (the “Property”).  Thompson claims that a September 28, 2021 storm caused significant wind and hail damage to her Property.

Insurance usually covers accident that happen or acts of God, negligence, etc., things that are Unintentional.  Policies will rarely cover willful or intentional conduct that causes harm.

The above is illustrated in a 2024 opinion from the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division.  The opinion is styled, Jacksonville, Realty, LLC v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyds.

The Plaintiff, Jacksonville, filed a summary judgement seeks the Court to rule that the policy contract had been broken by the Defendant.  The policy at issue is an errors and omissions policy.  Miller Title acted as the escrow agent for a real estate transaction between Jacksonville and IBF Retail I, LLC.  As part of the transaction, IBF deposited $2,750,000 in earnest money with Miller Title.

Cooperating with the your own insurance company when making a claim for policy benefits is almost always a requirement in the policy.  An opinion discussing this was issued by the Tyler Court of Appeals in 2024.  The opinion is styled, Kenneth R. Cade v. State Farm Lloyds.

On April 18, 2019, a windstorm blew a large tree onto a portion of Cade’s house that was insured by State Farm.  Cade eventually made a claim for damage to the structure and contents.  Several inspections were made and payment was made totaling approximately $30,000.  The personal property claim was not made until about 18 months later, claiming several items of personal property were damaged or destroyed.  A lawsuit resulted after State Farm denied paying further damages citing a lack of cooperation by Cade with the claim.  State Farm filed a motion for summary judgement which was granted.

The opinion details many more of the facts and testimony in the case which should be read.  This article will cite the law related to this type of claim.

The duty to cooperate with the insurance company investigation of a claim is something a lot of people don’t realize.  When it is your own insurance company, the insurance contract requires the insured to cooperate with the insurance company investigation of the claim.

This issue was the point of contention in a 2024 opinion from the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division.  The opinion is styled, Raymond Funes v. Allstate Vehicle And Property Insurance Company.

In this case, the facts are generally undisputed.  Plaintiff filed a claim in or around February 2021 for broken pipes at his property that was insured by Defendant.  He withdrew the claim in March 2021, but then retained an attorney and pursued the claim with Defendant in February 2023.  Defendant inspected the property and found that the home had been re-piped.  It requested the plumbing report and or invoice for the re-piping, but Plaintiff failed to oblige.  As such, Defendant denied the request for appraisal for “lack of cooperation by the insured.”  Subsequently, Plaintiff brought this suit.

Here is a 2024 opinion from the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, that deals with segregating damages in a homeowners claim.  The opinion is styled, David Espinoza v. State Farm Lloyds.

Espinoza had a State Farm homeowners policy in force when a storm caused damage to his home.  The claim was partially paid but State Farm but denied as to the full claim with State Farm alleging some of the damages were caused by matters not covered by the policy.   State Farm filed a motion for summary judgment based on Plaintiff being unable to segregate the covered damages from the uncovered damages.

For an insurance company to be liable for a breach of its duty to satisfy a claim presented by its insured, the insured must prove that its claim falls within the insuring agreement of the policy.

It is important to understand the time frame under which lawsuits must be filed.  As part of that, reading the insurance policy is vital.  A 2024 opinion from the Western District of Texas, Del Rio Division, discusses limitation periods written into insurance policies.  The opinion is styled, Antonio Caballero v. Allstate Vehicle And Property Insurance Company.

This case was decided on the summary judgment motion filed by Allstate.

This matter arises from an insurance claim.  The Plaintiff alleges hail storm property damage in excess of $20o,000.  The Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant on December 13, 2018.  The Defendant denied the Plaintiff’s claim on October 11, 2019.  The Plaintiff filed suit in Texas state court on August 21, 2023, asserting:  violations of the Texas Insurance Code and breach of contract among other causes of action.

An insured under an insurance policy has a duty to cooperate with an insurance company investigation of a claim.  This issue is discussed in the 2024 opinion, Henry & Lydia Ansah v. Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company.  The opinion is from the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division.

The Plaintiff’s allege that Nationwide underpaid their property insurance claim.  Nationwide ended up filing a motion for summary judgement arguing the Plaintiffs are not entitled to further coverage because they failed to make the damaged property available for inspection or to document the damages.

On February 18, 2021, Defendant received from Plaintiffs a claim for damages to their dwelling and personal property caused by a freeze event that occurred the day before.  On March 5, 2021, Defendant contacted Plaintiffs to discuss their claim and the claims process.  Defendant began investigating Plaintiffs’ claim and paid $87,122.07 for dwelling damage and at least $35,984.83 personal property damage.  Plaintiffs disputed Defendant’s valuation of their loss and invoked the Policy’s appraisal provision.  The appraisers determined that the actual cash value of the dwelling damage was $78,936.05 less than what Defendant had paid.

A misrepresentation in an insurance application is grounds for denial of a claim but it is not necessarily a win for the insurance company.  This issue is discussed in a recent opinion from the Texas 14th Court of Appeals.  The opinion is styled, Jose Palma v. Allied Trust Insurance Co.

This case was a summary judgment win for the insurance company but there is a clear distinction with this case and the vast majority of cases regarding misrepresentations.

Palma purchased an insurance policy for his home with appellee.  During the policy period, there was a fire at Palma’s home.  Palma submitted an insurance claim under the policy.  Allied investigated and found that Palma had a prior conviction for insurance fraud that was not disclosed on his application for

Here is a 2024 opinion from the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, that deals with an insurance policy.  Specifically, the wording of an insurance policy.  The opinion is styled, Johnetta Askew Hunt v. Meridian Security Insurance Company State Auto Insurance Companies.
This is a summary judgment opinion regarding “residing” at a premises.  The case deals with the coverage provided by a policy and where an insured, Hunt, tries to get more coverage than the policy provides.
In Texas, interpretation of an insurance policy begins with its actual words, because it is presumed parties intend what the words of their contract say.
Contact Information